Thermal Science 2022 Volume 26, Issue 3 Part A, Pages: 2093-2102
https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI210203182G
Full text (
1002 KB)
Cited by
Competitiveness of power systems with nuclear power plants and with high participation of intermittent renewable energy sources
Grković Vojin R. (Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia), vojingr@uns.ac.rs
Doder Đorđije D. (Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia)
In the paper are presented and discussed the results of a more complex research of technology portfolio's competitiveness in power systems with high penetration of intermittent renewable energy sources (i-RES). Possible technology portfolios compositions are analyzed. The portfolios comprise very high participation of i-RES, as well as a certain participation of energy storage technologies, but also and other energy technologies like nuclear and fossil fueled power plants. Within the research are developed new competitiveness indicators i.e., dispatchability indicator and the technology portfolio’s assured capacity. The latter is defined on the basis of recently published Ulrich’s and Schiffer’s paper. Obtained results point out that inclusion of pumped-hydro storage plants improves portfolio’s dispatchability. However, within the researched interval up to PHS installed capacities relative to i-RES capacities of 0.3. Numerical values of the dispatchability indicators are still below their values for the portfolio without i-RES. Increased participation of nuclear power plants contribute to the improvement of numerical values of the dispatchability indicators. The sensitivity analysis for the case of two times smaller cost of pumped hydro storage capacities is also performed. Hypothetical change of power system’s technology structure in sense of substitution hard coal and lignite fired power plants with wind generators or with nuclear power plants is also analyzed. The analysis points out that the substitution with nuclear power plants enables much better results regarding power system’s ability to change the power on demand than substitution with wind generators, particularly in the countries with high participation of hard coal and/or lignite in electricity generation.
Keywords: dispatchability indicators, energy technology portfolios, nuclear power, pumped-hydro storage, competitiveness
Show references
Porter, M. E., Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Companies, Free Press, New York, USA, 1980
Krugman, P., Competitiveness Dangerous Obsession, Foreign Affairs, 73 (1994), 2, pp 28-44
Chorafas, D., Energy, Environment, Natural Resources and Business Competitiveness, GOWER, Surrey, England, 2011
Grković, V., Doder, Dj., A Contribution Evaluation of Nuclear Power Plants Competitiveness Using 3E Indicator One Possible Approach, Thermal Science, 23 (2019) 6, pp. 4095-4105
Grković, V., Doder, Dj., On Competitiveness of Nuclear Power Plants in the Concept of Sustainable Development with Strong Restrictions of CO2 Emissions, Proceedings, (Eds. P. Stefanvić, D. Cvetinović), Power Plants 2018, Zlatibor, Srbija, 2018, ISBN 978-86-7877-029-6, pp. 351-361
Stevanović, V., Challenges of Energy Transition in Germany - Successes and Failures, Proceedings, IEEP 2019, Zlatibor, Srbija, 2019
Grković, V., Key Indicators for Competitiveness Assessment of Energy Technologies, Proceedings, International Conference Energy and Ecology Industry, Belgrade, Serbia, 2018, pp. 74-81
Grković, V., Ecology, Economy and Energy Evaluation of Electricity Generating Technologies Using 3E Indicator, Keynote Speech, Proceedings, (ed. G. Chen), IWEG2018, Hangzhou, China, 2018, pp. 139-144
Grković, V., Evaluation of Electricity Generating System’s Technology Mix Using 3E Indicator, Journal of Thermal Science, 28 (2019), 2, pp. 218-224
Grković, V., Doder, Dj., At the Technology Level Settled Indicators for Energy Technologies Competitiveness Assessment, Proceedings, 19th International Conference on Thermal Science and Engineering of Serbia, SIMTERM 2019, Sokobanja, Serbia, 2019, pp. 848-857
Jesche, R., et al., Flexibility through Highly-Efficient Technology, VGB PowerTech, (2012), 5, pp. 64-68
Kahlert, J., et al., Possibilities and Limits for Optimizing Operational Flexibility in Existing Power Plants, (in German), VGB PowerTech, (2013), 1/2, pp. 59-63
Ulrich, S., Schiffer, H.-W., Prospects for Development of Power Generation in Europe, VGB PowerTech, (2019), 12, pp. 43-50
Furch M., et al., Optimization of Power Plant Investments under Uncertain Renewable Energy Development Paths - A Multistage Stochastic Programming Approach, EWI Working Paper, No. 12/08, 2012
Grković, V., et al., Assured Capacity, Total Assured Capacity and Dispatchability of Serbian Power System and Power Plants - A Contribution the Research, Proceedings, Thermal Power Plants 2020, Zlatibor, Serbia, 2020, postponed due to COVID-19 pandemic
Grković, V., Competitiveness of Energy Technologies (in Serbian), Prometej, Novi Sad and the National Petroleum Committee of Serbia - the World Petroleum Council, Belgrade, Serbia, 2020
Steffen, B., Weber, C., Efficient Storage Capacity in Power Systems with Thermal and Renewable Generation, EWL Working paper No. 04/2011, Chair for Management Science and Energy Economics, University of Duisburg, Essen, Germany, 2011
Ferreira, H. L., et al., Characterisation of Electrical Energy Storage Technologies, Energy, 53 (2013), May, pp. 288-298
Dan, G., et al., An Integrated Energy Storage System Based on Hydrogen Storage, in: Advances in Energy Systems Engineering, (Ed. Kopanos G. M., et al.), Springer, New Yotk, USA, 2017, pp. 771-801
Karalis, C., Muhl, M., Interaction of Renewable and Conventional Energies - Large-Scale Battery Systems as a Connecting Link, VGB PowerTech, (2017), 1/2, pp. 46-49
Benesch, W. A., Karalis, C., Large-Scale Storage Options under Special Consideration of 6 × 15 mw Battery Example, VGB PowerTech, (2017), 4, pp. 30-34
Grković, V., Marginal Share of Renewable Energy Sources of Variable Electricity Generation - A Contribution the Concept Definition, Thermal Science, 19 (2015), 2, pp. 383-396
***, Capital Costs Estimates for Utility Scale Electricity Generating Plants, U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2016 http://www.eia.gov
Breeze, P., The Cost of power Generation, Business Insight, Warwick, UK, 2010
Zeller E., Totschung, G., The Future Role of Energy Storage in Europe, (in German), VGB PowerTech, (2016) 1/2, pp. 29-34
Kather, A., Future Climate Friendly Electricity Supply with Fossil Fired Power Plants (in German), VGB PowerTech, (2011), 9, pp. 44-53
Kisliakov, D., Pumped-Storage in Bulgaria - Developments, Current Situation and some Perspectives, Energy Procedia, 58 (2014), Dec., pp. 129-136
***, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_power_stations_in_Belgium, 2021.
***, https://ec.europa.eu/eipp/desktop/en/projects/project-32.html, 2021
***, https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object, 2021
***, Entso-e transparency platform. https://transparency. entsoe.eu, 2018
***, http://www.iea.org/statistics/statisticssearch/, 2018
***, https://www.energy-charts.de/power, 2018
***, https://www.energy-charts.de/energy, 2018
***, Electro energy portfolio of EPS, 2019
***, Government of Serbia, Ministry for Energy and Mining: https://www.mre.gov.rs, 2020